In "truth is" there is zero between the subject "thruth" and "is". In "truth = is" there is the sign = between the 2 words.
= is not the same as zero.
When we say "John is" we imply that "John is is truth" in the sense "John is = truth"; we imply that "truth is John is".
Let's call:
- John is: A
- truth: B
In "truth is John is": B is A
In switching A and B, we also switched = in is.
Furthermore: the same proposition can be expressed in 4 ways:
- John is (1)
- John is is truth (2)
- John is = truth (3)
- truth is John is (4)
By introducing the word truth, we could transform "A=B" in "B is A" and have "A = B AND B is A".
What is truth? Truth is AND truth = is.
"=" brings a new dimension to "zero".
Which? A dimension which is linked to zero.
This dimension is brought about by the imaginary unit i (i.e. the square root of -1) which also "is" even if we do not know what it is.
Knowledge is about thruth: thruth is the primary unit of knowledge while Truth is the all encompassing Knowledge.
1) knowledge:
- The primary unit is zero. It links "true" to "is": true is. This unit (some would say "information") is free: it doesn't require energy.
- The primary unit of knowledge is "true is". But, to bring this primary unit to the human brain, man needs to make a link between "true" and "is": he does that by using a primary imaginary unit "true = is". The link beween "true" and "is" is not free anymore: it requires energy.
- The primary unit of workable knowledge ("I know") transforms "true is" in "that is": "that" means "true equals".
2) Knowledge: encompasses all what is free of energy between zero and the infinite.
3) Workable Knowledge: encompasses all what is not free of energy between zero and the infinite. It requires Knowledge (Workable Knowledge feeds itself for free).
Does Knowledge require Workable Knowledge? Can Knowledge "be" without Workable Knowledge?
Does Knowledge NEED Workable Knowledge?
Copyright © 2012 . All rights reserved
